Why do we have quests?

This is a legitimate question I think. In an ideal world, player intrigue would be the main driver of story, with a solid GM team to support them. Second to this is GM driven plotlines. The fact is that a sizable portion, perhaps even the majority of the playerbase, are not play leaders who drive player plotlines. They are consumers of player driven, GM driven and designer created “content”.

In my experience, Quests tend to serve two roles. They give players an alternative to GM mediated plotlines when there is no GM around and they break the monotony of grinding when there is nobody to RP with (assuming small worlds). If you log into a server and nobody is on to RP with, you have five options:

  1. crafting/resource-grinding
  2. hunting/exploring
  3. automated quests
  4. parking your PC and going afk
  5. logging off

The last two are undesirable from the world’s standpoint, though the fourth is less so than the fifth. Depending on how grindy and diku-like the world is, there may be different emphases on the first two. An alternative to these is quests.

So why do we have quests? Is it to get to know the world better? This would certainly be the case for one-shot, non-repeatable quests for new characters and repeatable delivery quests. Is it there for the players to grind XP? On diku-like worlds, this is common and if it happens on your world, then it is a safe bet that that your players are roleplaying despite your world design, not because of it. Assuming that the world is not a diku and the players are just questing as another form of advancement (a quest grind instead of a mob slaying grind), we still have a place for them I think.

Player intrigue is the best option and GM driven plots a second, but what about low population worlds where players would like to adventure when nobody else is on? What about groups of players with no GM coverage? GMs can’t be everywhere at all times.
What about easing newbies into the world? If they are not coming into a world where they already know other players and unless players are unusually welcoming of strange faces – enough to involve them in plotlines without getting to know them first – then the newbie experience on a roleplay world can be very, very lonely. There should be some mechanism that can introduce them to the world and ideally, this mechanism should encourage them to meet people.

Quests are sort of a poor man’s GM plotline.

At least for low population worlds, worlds without “enough” GM coverage (is there such a thing as “enough GM coverage”?) and worlds that try to be newbie friendly, quests are needed. How can we have suitable quests that don’t involve any elephant gyrations?

Advertisements

About Dave

I’m a 38 year old American who has lived the past 9 years in Germany and India.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Why do we have quests?

  1. Edward says:

    One answer might be to look for ways to increase the number of GM’s, and ways to reduce the need for GM’s.

  2. Dave says:

    Quests reduce the need for GMs. Increasing the number of GMs is also tricky. You have to seriously vet GMs. One bad apple who was not properly vetter can wreck a world.

    But that is a post for another day. 🙂

  3. Edward says:

    I can think of a number of ways to attract GM’s; vetting is the problem. I wonder it it’s feasible to limit the authority of new GM’s sufficiently to prevent bad apples from doing much damage, while still allowing them to be useful. I’m sure it’s been tried. It seems like it would be possible, though it might be difficult.

    Quests are one way to reduce the need for GM’s, but I’m sure there are many other ways. Of course, you might need to combine a number of them.

    Good AI is one obvious method, but that’s largely a technology issue. Technological advances may eventually solve the problem (assuming Terminators don’t kill us all . . .). A more practical example might be encouraging (but not coercing) players to operate in groups, on the theory that groups require fewer GM’s than individuals. Most players will gravitate to social settings anyway, and facilitating this is probably desirable in itself. Of course, this brings up another set of problems, but that’s true of just about any solution. Lots of potential posts out there . . . .

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s